Joel Brodsky, center, former attorney for convicted murderer Drew Peterson answers questions as he leaves the Will County Courthouse Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013, in Joliet, Ill. after a special hearing involving Peterson's murder trial. A judge recessed Tuesday after the defense sought to bolster arguments Peterson deserved a retrial on charges he murdered his third wife, Kathleen Savio. Peterson's attorneys contend Brodsky his former lead trial attorney, botched his case. Among witnesses they called was Brodsky. Current Peterson attorney Steve Greenberg questioned him. The hearing resumes Wednesday. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green)

Mass. judge sends 2 drug lab cases to high court

Published: 09:28:10 PM, Wed 13 March 2013 UTC

BOSTON (AP) — A justice of the state's highest court agreed on Wednesday to ask the full court to decide two cases in which prosecutors are challenging how lower courts handle thousands of drug convictions jeopardized by what they say was a chemist's misconduct.

The chemist, Annie Dookhan, is accused of faking results and tampering with evidence at a state drug testing lab.

The scandal has thrown the state's judicial system into turmoil as prosecutors and defense attorneys try to deal with thousands of legal challenges to cases in which Dookhan was involved. Authorities say Dookhan tested drugs in about 34,000 cases during her nine years working at a now-closed Department of Public Health lab.

On Wednesday, Supreme Judicial Court Justice Margot Botsford heard arguments from a prosecutor challenging the authority of retired judges appointed as special magistrates to handle the Dookhan cases.

Botsford also heard from defense attorneys who asked the high court to step into the legal mess created by the testing scandal and come up with a "global remedy" to deal with the thousands of convicted drug offenders serving prison sentences in cases in which Dookhan was one of the chemists who performed tests.

Botsford agreed to send the cases of two drug defendants to the full court in May to answer questions from Essex County District Attorney Jonathan Blodgett on the authority of special magistrates. But she said she was reluctant to ask the court to rule on the request for its broader involvement while the state's attorney general and inspector general are conducting investigations into what happened at the lab.

"I do have some thought that there may well be ultimately a need for this court to play some role to find a more global solution than the system currently has in place," Botsford said.

Lawyers for the state's public defender agency and the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts argued that the high court needs to get involved to preserve the constitutional rights of defendants whose convictions have been tainted by the accusations against Dookhan.

Dookhan, of Franklin, admitted faking test results, forging signatures and skipping proper lab procedures, police say. She resigned last March and has pleaded not guilty.

There are thousands of defendants waiting for court hearings on their requests to be released from prison while legal challenges to their convictions make their way through the court system, said Randy Gioia, deputy chief counsel for the Committee for Public Counsel Services. He said they should not have to wait until the state's investigations into the lab scandal are completed and asked the court to conduct hearings to try to come up with a broad solution.

"Justice delayed is justice denied," Gioia said.

In the two cases being sent to the high court, Blodgett is asking the court to clarify whether retired judges appointed as special magistrates to hear the Dookhan cases have the authority to put prison sentences on hold and release defendants on bail while their requests for new trials are pending. Under normal circumstances, a judge first decides whether a defendant is entitled to a new trial and then considers whether that defendant should be released while awaiting that new trial.

Blodgett also is asking the high court to decide whether a special magistrate has the authority to reconsider a decision by a judge to deny a motion to put a sentence on hold and release a defendant on bail.

Blodgett also wants the court to clarify whether a guilty plea by a Dookhan defendant is valid if the process involves a judge and a special magistrate. Botsford took that request under advisement.

ACLU legal director Matthew Segal said after the hearing that he believes the high court should craft a global solution because there are "systemic issues of confusion" in the way the lower courts are handling the cases.

"Right now, people are suffering injury," Segal said. "Right now, people are being forced into guilty pleas if they can't get (sentences put on hold) because it's the only way to get relief before their sentences run out."

Tags: high court, lab, annie dookhan, judiciary, law_crime, cases, scandal, lawyer, defendants, defendant, magistrate, law, court, plea, judge, state, prosecutor, thousands, drug, legal challenges, authority, prison sentences, defense attorneys, american civil liberties, guilty pleas, convictions, drug convictions, new trial, lower courts, drug offenders, court hearings, global solution, blodgett, legal mess, dookhan, special magistrates, botsford, dookhan cases, special magistrate, justice margot botsford, drug lab cases, attorney jonathan blodgett, state drug testing, public health lab, proper lab procedures, aclu legal director, public counsel services, deputy chief counsel, dookhan defendant, drug defendants, mass. judge, testing scandal, release defendants, lab scandal, now-closed department, randy gioia, global remedy

Close
Loading
Close